PsychTech & Health Journal
https://psychtech-journal.com/index.php/psychTech
<p><strong>Aims and Scope</strong></p> <p>PsychTech & Health (ISSN 2184-1004) is a biannual scientific publication that aims to contribute to the development and dissemination of scientific knowledge of a theoretical and empirical nature in the areas of psychology and technology and how these can be related to the deepening of knowledge about human development and health, favoring research that presents itself with an interdisciplinary character. PsychTech & Health adopts the normative principles governing the promotion of open access policies to all published content for free. Its ambition is to be a forum open to renowned researchers and those who start either in research or in disseminating knowledge in the form of an article or another format that PsychTech & Health implements. When you want to be a forerunner for those starting PsychTech & Health you will take a pedagogical stance in the interaction that will establish between those who choose the journal to publicize their work.</p> <p>PsychTech & Health will publish original articles of revision or others that present themselves as relevant contributions to the discussion and deepening of scientific knowledge. However, this openness does not exempt, on the contrary, the papers submitted and accepted for publication are cracked by methodological rigor and can contribute to the development of scientific areas or promote the international debate around the themes developed at work. The submitted manuscripts must contain original, theoretical, or experimental data that have not yet been published (partial or full) or are not currently in the editorial evaluation process by another journal. Manuscripts may be submitted in Portuguese, English, and Spanish. Articles written in Portuguese must fully respect the spelling agreement of the Portuguese language (European standard). All articles submitted will be subject to a prior linguistic evaluation in order to assess their linguistic quality.</p> <p>PsychTech & Health subscribes to the American Psychological Association (APA, 7th Edition) citation standards and the<a href="https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/responsibilities-in-the-submission-and-peer-peview-process.html" target="_blank" rel="noopener"> International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) requirements</a> for submission of scientific papers and to be subject to a peer review system.</p> <p><strong>Open Access Statement</strong></p> <p>Psychtech & Health Journal publishes fully open-access journals, which means that all articles are available on the internet to all users immediately upon publication.</p> <p><strong>Licensing Information</strong></p> <p>PsychTech & Health adopts the "Creative Commons" CC BY-NC licensing. The use of the content published by PsychTech shall respect the terms provided by the "Creative Commons" license, according to which they may be used if it is not for commercial purposes and the sources used are duly cited.</p> <p>PsychTech & Health is the appropriate way of citing the journal in bibliographic</p>PsychTech and Health Journalen-USPsychTech & Health Journal2184-1004<p>When the article is published, the copyright is transferred from author to publisher.</p> <p>The work will be licensed under a <a href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/" rel="license">Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License</a>.</p>BEYOND METRICS: THE CRISIS OF ACADEMIC QUALITY IN PORTUGAL
https://psychtech-journal.com/index.php/psychTech/article/view/183
<p>In recent decades, academic research in Portugal has been profoundly shaped by the dominance of bibliometric metrics. Access to ISI and Scopus, initially intended to enhance international visibility, has instead fostered “academic inflation,” including artificial fragmentation of work and the proliferation of strategic co-authorships. The outcome is an exponential rise in publications, yet a stagnation in genuine innovation and social impact. This dynamic erodes scientific integrity, weakens the training of young scholars, and undermines public trust. Reversing this trend requires restoring the primacy of quality over quantity, and valuing teaching and scholarly depth above mere numerical output.</p>José Jacinto Vasconcelos-RaposoMiguel MeloPaulo Vieira
Copyright (c) 2025 PsychTech & Health Journal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
2025-10-032025-10-03911410.26580/PTHJ.ed17-2025THE PSYCHOLOGICAL ARCHITECTURE OF ELITE SPORTS PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE, INTERVENTIONS, AND RESEARCH PRIORITIES
https://psychtech-journal.com/index.php/psychTech/article/view/179
<p class="p1">This systematic review synthesizes contemporary research on the psychological profile of elite athletes, with a focus on self-confidence, anxiety/negativity, attentional control, motivation, imagery, positivity, and competitive attitude. Drawing on 48 empirical studies across diverse sports and global contexts, the review evaluates the dynamic relationships among these constructs, benchmarks psychological training interventions, and critically examines the unique roles of positivity and competitive attitude in elite performance. Findings show that self-confidence inversely correlates with anxiety/negativity, while attentional control and motivation are pivotal for sustaining resilience and competitive drive. Psychological skills training, encompassing imagery, relaxation, and cognitive restructuring, effectively enhance self-confidence and reduce anxiety/negativity, although intervention heterogeneity limits definitive conclusions. Persistent challenges include a lack of standardized measurement tools, a predominance of cross-sectional studies, and insufficient longitudinal and culturally adapted research. The review underscores the need for rigorous, longitudinal investigations and tailored interventions to advance theoretical models and optimize psychological preparation in elite sport.</p>José Vasconcelos-Raposo
Copyright (c) 2025 PsychTech & Health Journal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
2025-10-032025-10-039153010.26580/PTHJ.art78-2025FACTORS INFLUENCING VISUALIZATION AND ATHLETIC SELF-IMAGE IN STUDENT-ATHLETES
https://psychtech-journal.com/index.php/psychTech/article/view/178
<p class="p1">This study investigated the influence of sex, level of schooling, sport type, and years of competitive practice on the psychological attributes of student-athletes, specifically examining kinetic imagery, mental imagery, and athletic self-image. A quasi-experimental design was employed with a sample of 366 student-athletes (152 female, 214 male). Participants completed the Movement Imagery Questionnaire (MIQ) to assess kinetic and mental imagery, and a measure of athletic self-image. Data were analyzed using independent samples t-tests and one-way ANOVA. Results indicated that years of competitive practice had a significant main effect on athletic self-image (<em>p </em>< .001), with athletes having six or more years of experience reporting a stronger self-image than those with less experience. Significant differences were also found by sex, with males reporting greater ease in mental imagery (<em>p </em>= .030), and by level of schooling, where university students reported significantly more difficulty with both kinetic (<em>p </em>= .006) and mental imagery (<em>p </em>= .041) than 12th-grade students. No significant differences were observed for sport type (individual vs. collective) on any measure. The findings confirm that athletic self-image is a developmental construct strongly linked to experience. The counterintuitive results regarding schooling level suggest that factors such as metacognitive awareness or cognitive load may influence self-reported imagery ability. Overall, this study highlights the complex interplay of demographic and experiential factors on athletes’ psychological profiles and underscores the need for tailored mental skills training.</p>Hugo Rodrigues-FernandesMário Pinto
Copyright (c) 2025 PsychTech & Health Journal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
2025-10-032025-10-0391314010.26580/PTHJ.art79-2025DETERMINANT FACTORS OF SUCCESS IN ELITE COMPETITIVE SWIMMING: THE PERCEPTIONS OF OLYMPIC COACHES
https://psychtech-journal.com/index.php/psychTech/article/view/176
<p class="Body"><span lang="EN-US">This study explored the perceptions of 33 Olympic swimming coaches from 12 national federations on key factors influencing elite performance, focusing on coach education, professional context, engagement with science, training planning and monitoring, and multidisciplinary team collaboration. Using a validated 76-item online questionnaire, data were analyzed with descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests. Nearly all coaches held university degrees and valued initial academic training, prioritizing ongoing education through peer interaction and professional development. Over half regularly consulted scientific literature. Despite the emphasis on exclusive coaching dedication, one-third of coaches held second jobs, reflecting occupational instability at the Olympic level. Professional practice involved assessing technical, psychological, and physiological indicators. Greater coaching experience, particularly through multiple Olympic participations, led coaches to assume more responsibility in athlete preparation, emphasizing technical and dryland strength training and multidisciplinary team contributions, especially from psychologists. Three models of psychologist integration were identified: full team integration, inclusion in the medical department, and external consultancy. The study concludes that coaches believe success is underpinned by the convergence of academic training, competitive experience, systematic monitoring, technical specialization, and multidisciplinary support, while the full professionalization of coaching remains a significant structural challenge.</span></p>António Vasconcelos-RaposoCarlos FerreiraAndré AntunesAntónio Rosado
Copyright (c) 2025 PsychTech & Health Journal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
2025-10-032025-10-0391415810.26580/PTHJ.art80-2025MANAGING EMOTIONS IN COMPETITIVE SPORTS: INTEGRATED MODELS OF PSYCHOLOGICAL FLEXIBILITY
https://psychtech-journal.com/index.php/psychTech/article/view/184
<p>High-performance sport has evolved into an arena where psychological excellence is as decisive as physical prowess. The ability to effectively regulate emotions, particularly pre-competitive anxiety/negativity (PCA), consistently distinguishes elite performance. This article presents a critical and in-depth analysis of the contemporary literature on emotional management in sport. Beginning with a deconstruction of the athlete’s complex emotional landscape, it delves into the neurocognitive mechanisms and multifactorial antecedents of these states, identifying them as a central obstacle to optimal performance. The core of the work focuses on evaluating a spectrum of evidence-based psychological interventions, ranging from physiological regulation strategies and pre-competitive routines to third-wave approaches such as Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) and mindfulness training. The analysis reveals a paradigm shift from models aimed at eliminating anxiety/negativity to approaches that promote psychological flexibility and acceptance. It is concluded that the most effective intervention resides in an integrated, periodized, and personalized model—a “toolbox” of psychological skills—adapted to the athlete’s individual needs and the phases of their training cycle. This work argues that the future of sport psychology lies in promoting the athlete’s holistic well-being as the fundamental pillar for sustainable, high-level performance.</p>José Jacinto Vasconcelos-RaposoCarla M. Teixeira
Copyright (c) 2025 PsychTech & Health Journal
https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0
2025-10-032025-10-0391597210.26580/PTHJ.art81-2025